Posts Tagged “Cell Phone”

Interphone Witnesses testified about research into cell phone use and its potential impact on human health, as well as the potential side effects such as brain cancer and salivary gland tumors.

YouTube Preview Image

Source: Dr Magda Havas PhD

Most people are not aware of the damage that can be done by a cell/mobile phone. It is NOT the carrier that does the damage to your DNA but the information transmitted. Please review or other EMR posts on this blog for further evidence

EMR CAN be reduced to safe levels in the human system by a few methods.

  • Reduce Distance from the source or the EMR (not always possible
  • Reduce Exposure time
  • Apply EMR absorbing or Harmonizing Devices to the source
  • Wear EMR Absorbing or Harmonizing Devices on your person
  • Manage your home or workplace with Environmental Harmonization

See Also: Dr Magda Havas | Fosdac | Trius Technology | Amega Global |

Comments Comments Off

A growing body of evidence, dating back to the 1960s, suggests that brain tumors may be only one of the many health problems produced by our new wireless society will produce.

Cell-phone technology “could lead to a health crisis similar to those caused by asbestos, smoking, and lead in petrol,” warned the European Union’s environmental watchdog agency in 2007.

The most ambitious attempt to catalogue the health risks of cell phones to date is the industry-funded Interphone study, carried out by researchers from 13 different countries (not including the United States). Although the study has been criticized for selecting data in a way designed to play down the risks of cell phone use, it continues to turn up alarming findings nonetheless.

Among the findings so far are a 40 percent increase in brain tumor risk among adults who use a cell phone for 10 years (especially on the side of the head where the phone is held); a 300 percent increased risk of acoustic nerve tumors; and an increased risk of tumors of the parotid gland. The risk of a brain tumor increases by 400 percent in people who start using a cell phone before the age of 20.

Other studies, mostly out of Europe, have linked mobile phone and personal digital assistant (PDA) use to DNA damage, sperm death, and brain damage including early-onset dementia. These findings regularly make big news in the international press, but are by and large played down in U.S. media.

The United States has a long history of hostility toward the claim that the microwave radiation used by microwave ovens, cell phones, cell phone towers and wireless internet (Wi-Fi) can be harmful to human health. U.S. law prohibits challenging the placement of cell phone towers on health grounds, and an industry group (the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) is highly influential in setting exposure standards.

The first research on the risks of microwave radiation was actually uncovered by a U.S. researcher, Allan Frey, in the 1960s. Frey discovered that “nonionizing” electromagnetic radiation — previously thought to be harmless — could still produce biological effects. For example, radar waves can produce “sound” even in the absence of actual sound waves by interfering with the brain’s own electromagnetic signals. Frey found that microwaves could damage the organs of lab animals, even stopping their hearts completely.

Yet when Frey published a paper showing that microwave radiation could disrupt the functioning of the blood-brain barrier, the Office of Naval Research ordered him to conceal the work or lose funding. Pentagon-funded scientists claimed they had refuted his work, but refused to share any information on their data or methods.

Frey found that while the primary (or “carrier”) wave of microwave radiation can cause health problems, the secondary wave that carries the actual data — whether sound, text, pictures or other information transmitted via cell phones or Wi-Fi connections — is far more dangerous. The more data streams carried, the higher the danger.

Modern research supports these early findings, with 75 percent of independently funded studies showing health risks from cell phone radiation (in contrast with only 25 percent of industry funded studies). Researchers have also documented dramatic rises in the rate of numerous health problems immediately following the introduction of widespread Wi-Fi and cell phone networks across Europe.

Such concerns have led European governments to consider banning Wi-Fi in government facilities, and to the Austrian Medical Association’s call for a ban on Wi-Fi in schools. The national library of France has already removed all Wi-Fi connections due to health concerns.

In certain segments of the U.S. population, awareness is also growing. According to an anonymous investment banker speaking to a GQ reporter, rates of brain tumors among financial executives are shockingly high, a fact more and more people are attributing to constant cell phone use.

“I knew four or five people just at my firm who got tumors,” the banker said. “Each time, people ask the question. I hear it in the hallways.”

Sources for this story include:
Natural News
www.gq.com

[Opinion/Comment from Glenn]

A good friend of mine was a mobile phone dealer and was on the phone nearly 12 hours per day. He had 2 to use phones because the batteries would always die before he could get the phone recharged. I told him he was an accident waiting to happen but he said he was fine and on top of life. On his 47th birthday he collapsed in the bathroom.

In the hospital emergency they diagnosed a brain tumor near his right ear the size of a golf ball. He held his phone to his right ear. They removed it with surgery. I got him on an extreme nutritional program. He started to improve and got out of hospital earlier than the doctors expected. He stopped the nutrition, relapsed and died a month later.

Make amends now. Put biochips on your phone, computer, tv and anything that generates EMR. Wear a biopendant to absorb spurious EMR from devices that do not have biochips on them.

Energy Medicine Devices, Biochips & Pendants

[End Opinion]

Comments Comments Off

Eavesdropping Webcams, spying ISPs, toxic PCs, and more. Here are 21 dangers that the industry is hiding from you–and what you can do about them.

Dan Tynan – Mar 30, 2010 1:00 pm

Yes, the truth is out there. But they don’t want you to know about it.

Who’s “they”? It could be Google or product manufacturers, your boss or your wireless carrier, Hollywood or Uncle Sam.

What don’t they want you to know? That your cell phone, your Webcam, and your employer may be spying on you. That you’re probably paying too much for printer ink, and that your wicked-cool subsidized handset will cost you way more over time than an unsubsidized one. That your PC may be coated with toxic flame retardants. And that’s just for starters.

Don’t despair. For every dirty little secret revealed herein, we describe a fix or a way to work around it (if any exists). You don’t have to be a victim, if you know what to do.

Just remember: You’ve been warned.

Your ISP Is a Copyright Cop

The RIAA and the MPAA may have a new ally. The next people who bust you for illegally swapping music and movies could be the folks you pay for Internet access.

Illustration: Barry Blitt
The recording and film industries are seeking to manipulate upcoming net neutrality legislation to allow ISPs to scan the bits passing through their networks and to block any that may violate copyrights–similar to Comcast’s notorious attempts to throttle BitTorrent connections in 2007. The Federal Communications Commission’s recommended rule changes already contain an exception for “reasonable network management,” which could include sniffing for copyrighted content, says Jennifer Granick, civil liberties director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Meanwhile, according to leaked reports, the international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) now being negotiated in private sessions contains provisions requiring ISPs to police their own networks for copyright scofflaws. Critics of the proposed treaty fear that copyright holders will insert a “three-strikes” policy, under which users could have their Internet access revoked if they’re caught exchanging copyrighted content more than twice.

“It’s dangerous giving so much power to copyright claims,” says Wendy Seltzer, project leader for the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse and a Fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society. “Imagine someone telling you, ‘If you violate our copyrights, we can terminate your Net connection, not just your blog.’”

With such a powerful new partner playing the role of both investigator and enforcer, might copyright holders be emboldened to pursue more consumers suspected of violating copyrights? And what protections will consumers have against false claims of infringement?

The Fix: Contact your congressional representatives and tell them that you oppose net neutrality loopholes for content filtering. Support organizations such as Chilling Effects, the EFF, and Public Knowledge, which fight laws that turn ISPs into Hollywood’s hired guns.

Cell Phones Don’t Crash Airplanes

The Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration have each recommended that airlines not allow passengers to use cell phones during commercial flights. The FAA fears that the RF signal emitted by devices using the 800MHz spectrum band might interfere with the navigation systems of the plane, specifically GPS instrumentation. Yet there is no documented case of an air accident or serious malfunction caused by a cell phone’s interfering with a plane’s navigation system.

Read More on PC World

—————————————————-

Comments Comments Off

SAN FRANCISCO – Every cell phone sold in San Francisco could soon come with a label detailing the level of radiation you will be exposed to by using it and recommending a headset to avoid radiation exposure.

If a proposal endorsed Monday by the Commission on the Environment’s policy committee – and preliminarily supported by the mayor – moves forward, not only would consumers be alerted of potential risks of cell phone radiation, but it could become illegal to promote the
devices in public schools, and the federal government would be officially called upon to change their standards for cell phones.

The committee’s 3-0 vote came in response to some scientific studies that suggest cell phone radiation can, over long periods of time, cause brain tumors on the side of the brain where the phone is held, and men who carry cell phones in their pocket may experience lower sperm counts.

Read the complete article here:
http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Law-would-require-cell-phone-warnings-79284337.html

Glenn’s Comment: Sooner or later this will be become law all over the world when to scinece catches up to general knowledge. If you are seekeing solutions to EMR radiation (energy toxin) then visit my Energy Medicine website www.ClubMedec.com

Comments 1 Comment »